Permission to Hate?

Indiana Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith recently declared, “I hate Islam. It’s a demonic death cult,” and encouraged Hoosiers to become comfortable with “hating again.” He attempted to soften the statement by insisting that he loves Muslims, while hating Islam itself. These remarks were made publicly and have since been repeated and defended in subsequent interviews and social media posts.

As a Christian pastor, I believe those comments deserve a response. Not because I am interested in another round of partisan outrage. Not because I believe Christians and Muslims agree on every theological question. They deserve a response because making hatred acceptable is never acceptable.

When a statewide elected official, who is also a pastor, tells people they need “permission to hate again,” Christians should be among the first to object.

To be clear, I do not believe Micah Beckwith is the root problem. He is a symptom.

People do not arrive at this kind of rhetoric in isolation. They are shaped by theological systems, media ecosystems, political movements, and church cultures that reward fear, division, and certainty over humility, compassion, and relationship.

For years, a growing segment of American Christianity has been discipled not by the Sermon on the Mount but by outrage. Not by Jesus’ command to love enemies, but by the conviction that enemies must be defeated. Not by the way of the cross, but by the pursuit of cultural dominance.

What we are witnessing is not simply one politician saying something inflammatory. We are witnessing the fruit of a movement that has increasingly confused Christian faithfulness with political warfare.

The rise of Christian nationalism did not happen overnight. It was cultivated through decades of messaging that taught Christians to fear demographic change, distrust religious pluralism, and view those outside the faith as threats rather than neighbors.

Micah Beckwith did not create that system. But he is one of its most visible products.

Some Christians will undoubtedly defend Beckwith by pointing to Romans 12:9: “Let love be genuine; hate what is evil, hold fast to what is good.”

At first glance, that seems straightforward enough. The problem is that Scripture was never intended to be read one verse at a time.

Romans 12 is not a manifesto for cultural hostility. It is one of the New Testament’s most beautiful descriptions of Christian love.

Consider the surrounding verses: “Love one another with mutual affection…Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them…Do not repay anyone evil for evil…If your enemies are hungry, feed them…If they are thirsty, give them something to drink…Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”

Paul’s concern is not teaching Christians how to hate people more effectively. His concern is teaching Christians how to love in a world filled with evil.

When Paul says “hate what is evil,” he is not giving believers permission to baptize their personal prejudices, political opponents, or religious disagreements with divine approval. He is calling Christians to reject the forces that destroy human flourishing: violence, oppression, cruelty, exploitation, greed, injustice, and hatred itself.

In Romans 12, hatred is directed toward evil. Love is directed toward people. That distinction matters.

Jesus understood evil better than any of us ever will. He confronted religious hypocrisy. He challenged political power. He exposed injustice. He overturned tables.

Yet nowhere do we find Jesus teaching his followers to cultivate hatred toward entire groups of people or entire religious communities.

Instead, we hear difficult commands: Love your enemies. Pray for those who persecute you. Bless those who curse you. Do good to those who hate you.

These teachings are not sentimental. They are revolutionary.

Jesus understood that hatred has a way of consuming the person who carries it. Hatred rarely remains focused on ideas. Eventually it spills over onto people. History has demonstrated that reality again and again.

When leaders normalize hatred, communities become more fearful. When communities become more fearful, they become more willing to dehumanize others. And once people are dehumanized, all kinds of harm become easier to justify.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. understood this dynamic deeply. One of the central principles of nonviolence is this: Attack forces of evil, not persons doing evil.

King believed we must resist injustice with everything we have. But he also insisted that we never surrender the humanity of those with whom we disagree.

In other words, we oppose racism without hating racists. We oppose violence without hating violent people. We oppose injustice without hating those caught up in unjust systems.

Why? Because people are always more than the worst thing they have said, done, or believed. And because hatred cannot heal what hatred creates.

Dr. King understood that the goal is not the destruction of opponents. The goal is the creation of beloved community. That wisdom feels desperately needed today.

What is equally troubling is the silence from many of Indiana’s political leaders.

Governor Mike Braun and numerous Republican officials have largely avoided publicly challenging these remarks. Braun’s comment basically stated that Beckwith probably regrets how he phrased it. Not that he regrets the thought…just the phrasing! Perhaps that silence is political calculation. Perhaps it is fear of alienating a particular constituency. Perhaps it reflects agreement.

Whatever the reason, silence in moments like this carries its own message. Leadership is not only about speaking when it is easy. It is about speaking when it is necessary.

If an elected official can publicly encourage citizens to embrace hatred toward a religious tradition practiced by millions of Americans and billions worldwide, and fellow leaders remain silent, that silence becomes part of the story.

The church faces a choice. We can continue down a path where fear is mistaken for conviction and hostility is mistaken for courage. Or we can return to the difficult teachings of Jesus.

The teachings that command us to love neighbors. Love strangers. Love enemies. The teachings that refuse to reduce people to labels. The teachings that insist every person bears the image of God.

Christians can disagree profoundly with Islam. Christians can proclaim Christ as Lord. Christians can hold deep theological convictions.

But Christians cannot make hatred a virtue. Not if we intend to follow Jesus.

In a culture looking for permission to hate, Christians should be known for giving the world a reason to hope.

The Question Isn’t Whether Homelessness Exists Here

The ongoing conversation surrounding the proposed Anchor Resource Center at 333 E. Washington in Fort Wayne has revealed something important about our community. People care deeply about Fort Wayne.

Many of those raising concerns about the project are doing so because they genuinely care about safety, quality of life, local businesses, schools, churches, and neighborhoods. Those concerns should not be dismissed. Questions about implementation, security, staffing, transportation, and community impact are legitimate questions. Any project of this scale deserves careful scrutiny.

But legitimate concerns should not become an automatic barrier to action. At some point, every community must decide whether difficult realities will be addressed or simply discussed.

One of the recurring arguments against the proposed center is that it will bring homelessness and related challenges into the area surrounding Barr Street and downtown.

Yet that claim overlooks a simple reality: The area is already home to some of Fort Wayne’s most significant services for vulnerable populations.

The Rescue Mission has been located nearby for several years. St. Mary’s Soup Kitchen serves individuals experiencing food insecurity and homelessness in this area. Matthew 25 provides healthcare and support services to many who are struggling. Numerous churches, ministries, and service organizations already engage with vulnerable populations throughout downtown.

In other words, the need is already here. The people are already here. The services are already here.

The proposed resource center is not introducing homelessness into downtown Fort Wayne. It is an attempt to better coordinate responses to a reality that already exists.

That distinction matters.

Some opponents have expressed concerns that the center will negatively impact the Barr Street Farmers Market or other downtown destinations. Those concerns may feel understandable, but they remain speculative.

If the mere presence of people experiencing homelessness inevitably destroys public spaces, one might reasonably ask why that has not already happened.

The organizations serving vulnerable populations have existed in this area for years. The people they serve have been present in this neighborhood for years. Yet the Farmers Market continues to thrive and expand. Downtown continues to attract residents, visitors, businesses, and events.

Predictions about what might happen should be weighed against evidence of what is actually happening.

Another common suggestion has been that the resource center should simply be moved elsewhere. The challenge, however, is that “somewhere else” is rarely defined.

As city leaders have repeatedly acknowledged, there is no perfect location. Every potential site will have neighbors. Every potential site will have stakeholders. Every potential site will generate concerns.

To date, many who oppose the current location have called for an alternative site without identifying one.

That raises an important question: If every location is unacceptable, what solution is actually being proposed?

Sometimes communities unintentionally communicate that they support helping vulnerable people, as long as the help happens somewhere they do not have to see it.

Effective services cannot be hidden away from transportation routes, healthcare providers, social services, and the very resources people need to access. Relocating services farther away from existing support systems may make some people more comfortable, but it often makes it harder for vulnerable people to receive the help they need.

Perhaps we should ask different questions. Why is it assumed that people experiencing homelessness should always be the ones expected to move Why should those with the fewest resources bear the greatest burden of inconvenience?

If relocation is the preferred solution, perhaps the burden should not automatically fall on the “have nots.” Perhaps those of us with homes, businesses, churches, schools, vehicles, and resources should reflect on what sacrifices we are willing to make for the good of our community.

That may be an uncomfortable question. Yet communities are often defined by whose comfort they prioritize.

For people of faith, this conversation carries an additional layer of responsibility. Fort Wayne proudly refers to itself as “The City of Churches.” It is a beautiful nickname. But it becomes meaningful only when it shapes our actions.

The measure of a community is not how it treats the powerful, the connected, or the prosperous. The measure of a community is how it treats those who are struggling.

The proposed resource center will not solve homelessness. It will not solve addiction. It will not solve mental illness. No one is claiming that it will. But it represents an effort to respond to real needs with greater coordination, dignity, and compassion.

Reasonable people can debate the details. And, they should.

But we should be careful not to mistake discomfort for danger, speculation for evidence, or caution for compassion.

The question before Fort Wayne is not whether homelessness exists here. It does.

The question is whether we are willing to respond to that reality with courage, responsibility, and a commitment to care for our neighbors.

That is a conversation worth having.

When Truth is Optional…

There are moments when silence becomes complicity. I firmly believe we are living in one of those moments.

We are living in a time when truth is not merely contested, it is routinely discarded. Falsehood is no longer something to be ashamed of; it is wielded as a tool of power. Lies are seen as an acceptable means to an end. Perhaps most troubling of all, many who claim the name of Jesus have grown comfortable with it.

We live in a time where one of the most visible (and powerful) political leaders made over 30,000 false or misleading claims in his first four years in office! As this leader entered a second term, that pattern did not slow. Reports have noted that this leader is consistent in keeping pace with false and misleading statements the second time around. On his first day of his second term, he told at least 20 lies. 

Let’s be honest…we’ve all told our fair share of lies. But 20 per days is dizzying. How can one even keep up with that volume of lies?

This isn’t partisan commentary. This is a crisis of truth. The deeper crisis is not simply that a political leader lies…it is that so many are willing to accept, defend, and repeat those lies. 

Here’s the deal…Jesus does not leave us wiggle room here. “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.” (John 14:6) Not a version of the truth. Just the truth. To follow Jesus is to commit ourselves to truth in word, in spirit, and in practice.

Scripture is unflinching. In John 8:32, Jesus proclaims, “You shall know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” The author of Ephesians, in the 25th verse of the 4th chapter says, “Putting away falsehood, let all of us speak the truth to our neighbors.” The wisdom literature of the Bible is full of thoughts on telling the truth, including Proverbs 12:22 which states, “Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord.” 

The biblical witness does not treat truth as optional. As followers of the Way of Jesus, neither can we.

Here is a hard truth we must face: The greatest threat is not that politicians lie. The greatest threat is that the Church stops caring.

When Christians excuse dishonesty because it serves their preferred outcomes…When we share misinformation because it confirms what we already believe…When we defend what is false rather than confront it…We are no longer bearing witness to Jesus. We are bearing witness to something else entirely.

That should trouble us. Once truth is sacrificed, everything else eventually follows…justice, compassion, integrity, even faith itself become optional.

Scripture commands us not just to tell the truth, but to discern it. “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God.” (1 John 4:1)

Discernment requires effort. It requires courage. It requires a willingness to resist the pull of our own biases and the pressure of our communities. It requires the courage to admit when we are wrong. It requires the humility that allows others to change. It requires a commitment to be a people of honesty and integrity. 

Paul writes: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God.” (Romans 12:2) In the spirit of honesty, let’s go ahead and admit that many of us have been conformed more by cable news, social media, and political talking points than by the teachings of Jesus. We have traded discernment for outrage. We have traded wisdom for foolishness. We have traded truth for talking points and slogans.

If we are serious about following Jesus, then we must reclaim truth as a core practice of our discipleship. We must tell the truth, even when it costs us. Integrity is not situational. If something is false, we name it as false…even when it comes from leaders we support.

We need to stop spreading what we have not verified. If we would not stake our reputation on its accuracy, we should not share it. Period. We need to examine and name our own biases. We are all susceptible to believing what we want to be true. Discernment requires humility and self-examination.

As followers of the Way of Jesus, we must stay rooted in Scripture, not slogans. God’s Word is not a prop for our opinions. It is a light that exposes them. Psalm 119:105 reminds us, “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.” 

We need to quiet the noise around us so we can listen for the voice of the Spirit. Jesus promises: “When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth.” (John 16:13). We must be willing to listen and willing to be led somewhere we did not expect. We must be willing to stand apart and even alone. Truth-telling will put you at odds with people. Even people in our own churches. Faithfulness has always carried that cost.

The Church does not exist to echo the culture. The Church exists to bear witness to the truth. Not a watered-down truth. Not a convenient truth. But the kind of truth that sets people free. Too many churches and church leaders just share “happy go lucky” messages that keep people content and feeling good about themselves. Maybe there is a time and place for that. But this simply is not the time!

This is not the time to soften our language or blur the lines. If we cannot name lies as lies, we have already lost our way. If we cannot discern truth from falsehood, we are not being formed by Christ. If we cannot commit ourselves to truth, we cannot claim to follow the One who is Truth.

The world does not need more noise. It needs a Church that refuses to trade truth for power. A Church that refuses to baptize falsehood. A Church that still has the courage to live and speak in the light.

About Fruit

It seems like almost every hour of the day, something happens in our world that reminds us how far we are from the heart of God. Another act of violence. Another racist rant. Another policy rooted in fear. Another “Christian” voice defending cruelty in the name of righteousness.

We live in a moment thick with fear, hatred, xenophobia, racism and all the isms and phobias that portray a spirit not of Christ. In the middle of it all, the Apostle Paul’s words echo with piercing clarity: “By contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such things.” (Galatians 5:22–23, NRSV)

Paul doesn’t describe the fruit of the Spirit as doctrinal precision. He doesn’t name national dominance. He doesn’t list power, influence, or political victory. He names love.

Not just love, but a whole ecosystem of Spirit-shaped virtues that make domination impossible and idolatry obvious.

What we are witnessing in American Christianity is not simply political engagement. It is theological confusion.

Christian nationalism has hijacked large swaths of evangelical Christianity, confusing patriotism for faith, political allegiance for orthodoxy, and the agenda of political leaders for the Way of Jesus.

The recent dedication of a gold statue of the President outside Mar-a-Lago, prayed over and blessed by evangelical leaders, should haunt us. Golden statues and religious blessings have a long biblical history. None of it ends well. When power, privilege, ego, and greed rule the day, the Spirit quietly departs.

Even more troubling is how figures like Doug Wilson, the so-called “pastor” of Pete Hegseth, have been platformed by prominent evangelical institutions such as Desiring God, The Gospel Coalition, Acts 29, and Ligonier Ministries. Many even within conservative evangelical circles have distanced themselves from Wilson’s theology and rhetoric, yet the damage has been done. 

At some point, the evangelical movement needs to own their role in the elevation of the Christian nationalist movement.  When churches amplify voices that traffic in division, hierarchy, and culture-war triumphalism, we should not be surprised when congregations begin to confuse aggression with boldness and cruelty with conviction.

Jesus was clear: a tree is known by its fruit. If those hailed as “God’s chosen” consistently display arrogance instead of gentleness, rage instead of patience, cruelty instead of kindness, self-indulgence instead of self-control, then something is wrong at the root.

The fruit of the Spirit is not a suggestion; it is evidence of a life rooted and grounded in Jesus.

It is more than unsettling to watch political leaders attempt to lecture the Pope about theology and Christian faith. The pride. The ego. The audacity. When politicians, platformed by ill-guided religious leaders, assume authority over centuries of theological reflection and pastoral care, we are not witnessing strength. We are witnessing spiritual shallowness.

Much of the outrage directed at the Pope and other Christian leaders who critique the current U.S. administration reveals a deeper issue: many simply do not know Scripture. The Pope hasn’t said anything that contradicts Scripture or the theological heritage of the Church. Those critiquing the Pope demonstrate that they have accepted partisan narratives as the Gospel. They have substituted cable news theology for the Sermon on the Mount. They defend “Christian values” while neglecting Christ.

It is painful to say, but it must be said: I fear many Christians do not know the Gospel. I fear some do not know Jesus.

It is also worth naming, plainly and honestly, that many who have been platformed and even idolized by the religious right seem to reflect less the fruit of the Spirit and more what Paul warns against just a few verses earlier. In Galatians 5:19–21, Paul speaks of “enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions, envy,” a sobering list that feels far too familiar in today’s religious and political rhetoric. When leaders consistently stir division, trade in outrage, and cling to power at all costs, we should not rush to defend them…we should discern them. The contrast Paul offers is not abstract; it is diagnostic. If the fruit is missing, or if entirely different fruit is being produced, then we must have the courage to question the root.

In a world addicted to outrage, the fruit of the Spirit is revolutionary. Love in a culture of contempt. Joy in a politics of grievance. Peace in an economy of fear. Patience in an age of instant reaction. Kindness where cruelty trends. Generosity in systems built on both scarcity and greed. Faithfulness when loyalty is transactional. Gentleness in the face of bluster. Self-control when rage is rewarded.

This is not weakness. This is resistance. The early Christians changed the world not by seizing Caesar’s throne but by embodying a different kingdom.

Fruit grows from proximity. If we want the fruit of the Spirit, we must stay close to the Spirit. Here are some ways to do that:

1. Study Scripture deeply and humbly. Not through partisan lenses. Not looking for proof texts to defend our agenda. But prayerfully, contextually, and in community. So many have embraced non-biblical narratives because they have not wrestled with the actual text. Read the Gospels slowly. Sit with the Sermon on the Mount. Let Jesus shape us.

2. Practice self-examination. Before critiquing the religious or political leaders, ask: Is love evident in me? Is gentleness? Is self-control? The fruit begins at home.

3. Commit to diverse Christian community. The Spirit often speaks through voices outside our echo chambers. Listen to believers from different cultures, traditions, and experiences.

4. Fast from outrage. Limit the media that feeds anger and fear. Replace it with prayer, silence, and acts of mercy. 

5. Embody love. Welcome the stranger. Defend the vulnerable. Refuse racist jokes. Speak truth to power. Love is not intended to be abstract. It is to be practiced.

There is something disturbing happening in our world almost every moment of the day. But that disturbance is also a summons. A summons to return to Jesus. A summons to reject idolatry. A summons to disentangle faith from nationalism. A summons to bear fruit.

The world does not need louder Christians. It needs Christians who look like Christ.

The Spirit is still producing fruit. The question is whether we will allow our lives to become the orchard.

The Short Answer Is…”Because I Follow in the Way of Jesus”

News of the low-barrier, 24/7 homelessness resource center planned for downtown Fort Wayne has been circulating throughout our fine city. The stories, questions, and concerns have recently increased as a city councilman voiced some concerns. When Downtown Fort Wayne released their concerns inviting the city to pump the brakes, more rumors, questions and concerns have risen.

As the most direct neighbor to the proposed location, I have been able to meet with officials from the city on multiple occassions to hear about the proposal, ask questions, and have my concerns addressed. After these meetings, I am lending my support to this project.

Some expressing concern have implied that this proposed center is inviting a “problem” into the area. I would invite those folks to come spend just 45-minutes with me at 300 E. Wayne Street as they will quickly see that this is actually a response to an existing issue, not the creation of a new one. Also, let us remember that this “problem” is someone’s son, daughter, brother, sister, friend, our neighbor.

I would also like to remind folks who are saying this location will prevent development that it is right across the street from the Rescue Mission. It’s not like they are proposing to put this next to the development near the riverfront. It’s across the street from existing homeless services and less than a block from a low to no income healthcare facility (Matthew 25).

If we wait for the ideal location, we will never make progress. There will never be a “perfect” location for this type of facility. But, placing it in an area that is already serving this population makes sense.

With this blog, I’m including two statements I prepared to express my support this cause. For those who don’t want to read through the message, here’s the short answer. I’m supporting this project because I am committed to following in the way of Jesus (you know, the One who made time and space for the hungry, sick, thirsty, isolated, lonely, disturbed, unsheltered, outcasts, marginalized and vulnerable).

Here’s a letter of support I wrote:

To Whom It May Concern,

As the Lead Pastor of First Wayne Street United Methodist Church in downtown Fort Wayne, I write to offer my support for the proposed low-barrier, 24/7 resource center for our unhoused neighbors.

For years, our congregation has been deeply engaged in ministry alongside individuals experiencing homelessness, poverty, and addiction. We regularly encounter neighbors who, for one reason or another, are unable to access existing shelters or service agencies. Some are turned away due to capacity limits. Others do not meet intake requirements. Still others struggle with mental health or substance use challenges that make participation in structured programs difficult.

At present, we have no consistent place to refer these individuals, especially outside of standard business hours. A 24/7, low-barrier facility would provide an essential referral option, ensuring that when someone shows up at our doors, we are not left with no safe alternative to offer. The ability to connect people to care immediately would be a tremendous asset to both churches and community partners.

We also recognize that a facility of this nature may draw individuals who are actively struggling with addiction or untreated mental health challenges. As a downtown congregation with children, youth, and elderly adults regularly participating in worship services, recovery groups, and community programming, we take safety concerns seriously. Increased presence and security are important considerations, and we are grateful that the proposed plan includes monitoring and oversight of the property. Knowing that the facility will have structured supervision, clear policies, and coordination with community partners helps alleviate many of our primary concerns as a direct neighbor.

At the same time, we must be honest: the need for this center outweighs the concerns.

Every day, we see the human cost of inadequate access to shelter and resources. We see neighbors sleeping in unsafe places. We see people cycling through emergency rooms, jails, and temporary solutions. We see the exhaustion of those trying to navigate a system that often feels inaccessible or overwhelming. A 24/7 resource center represents a practical and compassionate step toward stability, coordination, and dignity.

As a congregation rooted in the Wesleyan tradition, responding to the needs of our marginalized and vulnerable neighbors is not optional. It is central to our calling. While we will be direct neighbors, sharing the same city block, taking a “not in my backyard” approach is not consistent with our faith or our mission. We believe that communities are strengthened when we invest in thoughtful, well-managed solutions that care for those on the margins.

This proposed center is not a cure-all. But it is a hopeful step forward. It signals that our city is willing to acknowledge the growing need and respond with intentionality and compassion. With clear collaboration, responsible oversight, and ongoing communication, we believe this facility can become a stabilizing presence that benefits both its participants and the broader downtown community.

Thank you for your leadership and for your willingness to address complex challenges with courage and vision. First Wayne Street United Methodist Church stands ready to continue partnering in efforts that reflect the best of who we are as a city…compassionate, collaborative, and committed to the dignity of every person.

Here’s a brief statement I wrote for a local news outlet:

This is a defining moment for Fort Wayne and we need to be honest about what’s at stake.

Right now, people in our community are suffering in plain sight. They are sleeping outside, being turned away from shelters, cycling through systems that were never designed to truly help them and too often, we’ve learned to look the other way. That is not just unfortunate. It is unacceptable.

Let’s be clear: the real crisis is not this facility. The real crisis is our willingness to tolerate human beings living and dying without dignity.

A 24/7, low-barrier resource center is not some extreme idea. It is the bare minimum of what compassion requires. If we find ourselves more concerned about inconvenience than we are about human life, then we have lost our moral compass.

As a church, we reject the idea that faith means staying comfortable while others suffer. That is not the way of Jesus. We are called to show up, to stand with those on the margins, and to build a community where no one is disposable.

So yes, there are concerns, but there is also a deeper question: who are we going to be?

This is our moment to choose courage over fear, compassion over apathy, and dignity over neglect. And we should not hesitate.